We have no risk analysis for the product
The General Product Safety Regulation requires an internal risk analysis before a product is placed on the market, and CE directives using Module A require an adequate analysis and assessment of the risks in the technical documentation. Work through the aspects in Article 6 of the GPSR, record each risk with the solution and the evidence, link the standards applied, and update the analysis when the product changes.
Free account · no card · opens in the Demo Company
Reviewed 4 October 2026 by the Conphora compliance team · Not legal advice
Why this happens
A risk analysis is now a legal document for most consumer products. The General Product Safety Regulation (EU) 2023/988 requires manufacturers, before placing a product on the market, to carry out an internal risk analysis and draw up technical documentation (Article 9(2)). Where appropriate with regard to the possible risks, that documentation contains an analysis of the risks related to the product and the solutions adopted to eliminate or mitigate them, including the outcome of test reports, and the list of standards or other elements applied; partly applied standards are identified by the parts applied. For products subject to Union harmonisation legislation, Article 9 does not apply and the act's own file rules do (Article 2(1), third subparagraph, point (b)).[1]
The regulation also says what the analysis looks at. Article 6(1) lists the aspects for assessing safety: the characteristics of the product, including design, composition, packaging and instructions for assembly, installation, use and maintenance; its effect on other products and theirs on it; its presentation, labelling, warnings and instructions; the categories of consumers, in particular vulnerable consumers such as children, older people and persons with disabilities; appearance that may lead to unintended use, including resemblance to food or to something appealing to children; and, where the nature of the product requires it, cybersecurity features and evolving, learning and predictive functions. Where no presumption of conformity applies, Article 8(1) adds elements such as other European and international standards, Commission guidelines on product safety assessment, the state of the art and reasonable consumer expectations.[1]
CE directives built on Module A have asked for the same thing for years. Under the Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU, the technical documentation makes it possible to assess conformity and includes an adequate analysis and assessment of the risks; it specifies the applicable requirements and covers the design, manufacture and operation of the equipment (Annex III point 2). The wording comes from Module A in Annex II of Decision No 768/2008/EC, the common framework used across the product directives. The toy directive is more explicit: before placing a toy on the market, the manufacturer analyses its chemical, physical, mechanical, electrical, flammability, hygiene and radioactivity hazards and assesses the potential exposure to them (Directive 2009/48/EC Article 18).[2][3][4]
The analysis is never finished. The GPSR requires the technical documentation to be kept up to date (Article 9(3)) and procedures to keep series production in conformity (Article 9(4)). The Low Voltage Directive requires changes in product design or characteristics and changes in the standards applied to be adequately taken into account (Article 6(4)). A file without a risk analysis is incomplete, and an authority can require the operator to rectify that formal non-compliance (Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 Article 16(3)(a)).[1][2][5]
How to solve it
-
Describe the product, its users and its foreseeable use
Write down what the product is, how it is assembled, installed, used, maintained and disposed of, which products it is used with, and who will use it. Include vulnerable users such as children, older people and persons with disabilities, and uses the appearance of the product may invite.
Compliance ManagerAcademy · account needed Free Open -
Go through the hazards aspect by aspect
Use the aspects in Article 6(1) of the GPSR as a checklist: characteristics and packaging, effect on and from other products, presentation and warnings, categories of users, misleading appearance, cybersecurity and learning functions where relevant. For toys, add the chemical, physical, mechanical, electrical, flammability, hygiene and radioactivity hazards of Article 18.
-
Record each risk with its solution and evidence
For every hazard found, note the solution adopted to eliminate or reduce it, the residual risk, and the evidence: a test report, a calculation, an inspection or a warning in the instructions. This record is what the technical documentation means by the analysis of risks and the solutions adopted.
Documentation generatorCompliance engine Open in the console -
Link the standards and mark partial use
List the harmonised or European standards applied and the clauses that cover each risk. Where a standard was only partly applied, identify the parts that were and describe the solution for the rest. A standard covers only the risks it addresses.
-
Review the analysis when something changes
Set triggers for a review: a design or component change, a new standard version, a complaint or accident, or a new group of users. The technical documentation must be kept up to date, and changes in design and standards must be taken into account in series production.
Work through the steps in the platform with your own product.
What you need to show
| Document | Where it comes from | Legal ground |
|---|---|---|
| The internal risk analysis: hazards, solutions, residual risks and evidence | The manufacturer | GPSR Article 9(2); Directive 2014/35/EU Annex III point 2 |
| The list of standards applied, with the parts applied where partial | The manufacturer | GPSR Article 9(2)(b); Directive 2014/35/EU Annex III point 2(d) |
| For toys, the safety assessment of the Article 18 hazards | The manufacturer | Directive 2009/48/EC Article 18 |
If you do nothing
No analysis, no placing on the market
Manufacturers carry out the internal risk analysis before placing their products on the market (GPSR Article 9(2)), and an importer must not place a product until the manufacturer has done so (Article 11(1) and (2)).[1]
A standard does not end the discussion
The presumption of conformity from European standards does not prevent market surveillance authorities from taking all appropriate measures where there is evidence that the product is dangerous (GPSR Article 7(3)).[1]
An incomplete file under a CE directive
The Module A technical documentation must include an adequate analysis and assessment of the risks (Directive 2014/35/EU Annex III point 2); a file without it is a non-compliance the authority can order rectified (Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 Article 16(3)(a)).[2]
Questions about this problem
Is a test report the same as a risk analysis?
No. A test report shows how the product performed against a test. The risk analysis identifies the risks and the solutions adopted, and includes the outcome of test reports as evidence (GPSR Article 9(2)(a)).
If we apply a harmonised standard, do we still need a risk analysis?
Yes. Under Module A the technical documentation includes an adequate analysis and assessment of the risks as well as the list of standards applied (Directive 2014/35/EU Annex III point 2; Decision No 768/2008/EC Annex II, Module A point 2).
Does the law prescribe a method?
Article 9(2) of the GPSR does not prescribe one. It sets the aspects to assess in Article 6(1), and Article 8(1) names elements to take into account, including Commission recommendations or guidelines on product safety assessment, standards and the state of the art.
Must the analysis consider misuse?
The GPSR assessment covers appearance that is likely to lead consumers to use the product differently from its design, and products likely to be used by children although not intended for them (Article 6(1)(f)).
Is a safer competing product a reason to call ours unsafe?
No. The feasibility of a higher level of safety, or the availability of products with a lesser risk, is not in itself grounds for considering a product dangerous (GPSR Article 6(2)).
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on general product safety (consolidated text of 29 May 2026) EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
- Directive 2014/35/EU on electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits (consolidated text of 30 May 2026) EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
- Decision No 768/2008/EC on a common framework for the marketing of products EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
- Directive 2009/48/EC on the safety of toys (consolidated text of 29 August 2026) EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance and compliance of products (consolidated text of 12 August 2026) EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
About this page
- Reviewer
- Conphora compliance team
- Reviewed
- 4 October 2026
General information, not legal advice. Check the legal text or ask an adviser about your own product.
Conphora (2026). We have no risk analysis for the product. Retrieved 13 October 2026 from https://www.conphora.com/solutions/problem/risk-analysis-missing/
Conphora (2026) We have no risk analysis for the product. Available at: https://www.conphora.com/solutions/problem/risk-analysis-missing/ (Accessed 13 October 2026).
@misc{conphora2026wehavenoriskanalysisfort,
author = {Conphora},
title = {We have no risk analysis for the product},
year = {2026},
url = {https://www.conphora.com/solutions/problem/risk-analysis-missing/},
note = {Retrieved 13 October 2026}
} See it working before you add a product
The Demo Company is a complete, read-only example — products, documents, supplier requests and deadlines. Open it with a free account; no card, no trial clock.
Free account · no card · opens in the Demo Company