Esc

Site search arrives with the platform catalogue. Until then, start from one of these:

Sustainability and green claims Manufacturer · Online seller · Distributor 6 min read

We made a green claim and cannot document it

Under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, a court or authority can require you to prove a factual claim and treat it as inaccurate if the evidence is missing or insufficient. Since 27 September 2026, generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance are banned outright. Pull or narrow each claim you cannot substantiate now, and keep evidence for those you keep.

Free account · no card · opens in the Demo Company

Reviewed 4 October 2026 by the Conphora compliance team · Not legal advice

Why this happens

Environmental claims are governed by consumer law. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, Directive 2005/29/EC, prohibits unfair commercial practices (Article 5(1)), and a practice is misleading if it contains false information or deceives, or is likely to deceive, the average consumer, even when the information is factually correct, including through its overall presentation (Article 6(1)). The main characteristics it lists include environmental or social characteristics and circularity aspects such as durability, reparability and recyclability (Article 6(1)(b), as amended by Directive (EU) 2024/825).[1][2]

Evidence is where many claims fail. Under Article 12, Member States give courts and administrative authorities the power to require the trader to furnish evidence of the accuracy of factual claims, and to consider those claims inaccurate if the evidence demanded is not furnished or is deemed insufficient. The directive also lets persons with a legitimate interest, including competitors, take action against unfair practices (Article 11(1)). A claim that was published without an evidence file is therefore a claim that cannot be defended when someone asks.[1]

Directive (EU) 2024/825 made several green claims unlawful in all circumstances. Member States had to adopt the measures by 27 March 2026 and apply them from 27 September 2026 (Article 4(1)). Annex I to the UCPD now lists, among others, generic environmental claims for which the trader cannot demonstrate recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim (point 4a), claims about the entire product or business that concern only one aspect (point 4b), and claims that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive greenhouse gas impact because of offsetting (point 4c). For these, the question is not whether the consumer was misled; the practice is unfair as such (Article 5(5)).[1][2]

The recitals give examples. 'Environmentally friendly', 'eco-friendly', 'green', 'climate friendly', 'biodegradable' and 'biobased' are generic claims when not specified on the same medium. 'Climate-friendly packaging' is generic, while '100 % of energy used to produce this packaging comes from renewable sources' is specific (Directive (EU) 2024/825 recital 9). Recognised excellent environmental performance means compliance with the EU Ecolabel, an officially recognised EN ISO 14024 scheme, or top performance under other Union law (UCPD Article 2(s)).[2]

A separate Green Claims Directive was proposed by the Commission in March 2023 to set detailed substantiation and verification rules. On 4 October 2026 EUR-Lex lists procedure 2023/0085(COD) as ongoing, with first-reading steps and no adopted act, so it is not law. Penalties for UCPD infringements are set nationally. Where they are imposed in coordinated enforcement under Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, fines must be possible with a maximum of at least 4 % of the trader's annual turnover in the Member States concerned, or at least EUR 2 million where turnover data are not available (Article 13(3) and (4)).[3][1]

How to solve it

  1. Write down exactly what is claimed, where and since when

    Copy the claim word for word, with the images, colours and symbols around it, and list every place it appears: packs in stock, product pages, marketplace listings, ads and retailer feeds. The question is answered for the claim as the consumer sees it, not for the internal intention.

    GreenWashing scannerTools Open the app
  2. Collect the evidence that exists today

    Gather test reports, supplier certificates, life-cycle data and calculations. Check each one: does it cover this product, the whole product or one part, and the period of the claim? Evidence that covers only packaging cannot support a claim about the product.

  3. Decide per claim: keep, narrow or remove

    Keep a claim only if the evidence covers it fully. Narrow a claim to what the evidence shows, stated clearly on the same medium. Remove generic claims such as 'eco-friendly' unless you can show recognised excellent environmental performance, and remove climate claims about the product that rest on offsetting.

  4. Answer the request in writing

    Send the evidence for the claims you keep. For claims you remove, say that they have been withdrawn and from which channels and date. Do not send general sustainability material in place of evidence for the specific claim.

  5. Stop new stock and new campaigns carrying the old claim

    Change the artwork for the next print run, update listings and feeds, and tell retailers which claims to take down. Packs already printed are a business decision; the claim on them is still assessed as it reaches consumers.

    Knowledge & insightsKnow-how Free Open

Work through the steps in the platform with your own product.

What you need to show

DocumentWhere it comes fromLegal ground
A register of live environmental claims, with wording, channel and dateMarketing and e-commerceDirective 2005/29/EC Article 2(o) (environmental claim)
The evidence file per claim kept, or the decision to withdraw itThe person responsible for the claimDirective 2005/29/EC Article 12
Proof of recognised excellent environmental performance for any generic claimThe EU Ecolabel licence or an officially recognised EN ISO 14024 schemeDirective 2005/29/EC Article 2(s) and Annex I point 4a

If you do nothing

Missing evidence means the claim counts as inaccurate

Authorities or courts may require the trader to furnish evidence of the accuracy of factual claims and may consider them inaccurate if the evidence is not furnished or is insufficient (Directive 2005/29/EC Article 12).[1]

Some green claims are banned in all circumstances

Generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance, whole-product claims that concern only one aspect, and offset-based climate claims are on the list of practices that are always unfair (Directive 2005/29/EC Annex I points 4a to 4c).[1]

Fines and consumer remedies

Member States set penalties. Where penalties are imposed under Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 (coordinated enforcement), fines must be possible with a maximum of at least 4 % of the trader's annual turnover in the Member States concerned. Consumers harmed must have access to remedies such as compensation or a price reduction (Directive 2005/29/EC Articles 11a and 13).[1]

Questions about this problem

Is it enough that the claim is true?

No. A claim can mislead through its overall presentation even if the information is factually correct (Directive 2005/29/EC Article 6(1)). And if you cannot furnish the evidence when asked, the authority or court may treat the claim as inaccurate (Article 12).

Does the Green Claims Directive set the evidence rules?

Not as law. The Commission proposed a Green Claims Directive in March 2023 (COM(2023) 166). On 4 October 2026 EUR-Lex lists procedure 2023/0085(COD) as ongoing, with first-reading steps in 2023 and 2024 and no adopted directive. The rules that apply are the UCPD as amended by Directive (EU) 2024/825.

What counts as recognised excellent environmental performance?

Performance compliant with the EU Ecolabel Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, with officially recognised EN ISO 14024 type I ecolabels in the Member States, or top environmental performance under other Union law, such as energy label class A (Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2(s); Directive (EU) 2024/825 recital 10).

Can we keep a claim if we make it more specific?

A claim whose specification is given in clear and prominent terms on the same medium is not a generic environmental claim (Directive 2005/29/EC Article 2(p)). It must still be accurate and substantiated, and must not overstate the benefit.

Sources

  1. Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices (consolidated text of 27 September 2026) EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
  2. Directive (EU) 2024/825 on empowering consumers for the green transition EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026
  3. Proposal for a Directive on substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive), COM(2023) 166 EUR-Lex · accessed 4 October 2026

About this page

Reviewer
Conphora compliance team
Reviewed
4 October 2026
Cite this page
Conphora (2026). We made a green claim and cannot document it. Retrieved 13 October 2026 from https://www.conphora.com/solutions/problem/green-claim-no-evidence/
Reviewed
Demo Company

See it working before you add a product

The Demo Company is a complete, read-only example — products, documents, supplier requests and deadlines. Open it with a free account; no card, no trial clock.

Free account · no card · opens in the Demo Company